Article: PDF
DOI: 10.26170/2071-2405-2025-30-3-185-195
Abstract: The present article is devoted to the notion of creative writing as an essential tool and an undervalued and underused scaffold in the process of second foreign language instruction and acquisition. The author aims at specifying such terms as scaffolded instruction and creative writing, in order to prove the point that numerous limitations that characterize the second foreign language teaching process make a constant search for optimal methods indispensable, and creative writing can become an extremely useful resource in this regard, serving not as an accessory but a necessity, adaptable to those limitations. To conduct the research described, mixed methods have proven most efficient, including but not limited to observation and analytical research of language models, descriptive research conducted individually, in pairs or in groups; and project-based creative flow implemented within the framework of the interpretative and communicative language teaching models. Research has shown that creative writing as a teaching technique can be fully aligned with the main principles of scaffolded instruction and may contribute to creating a conducive teaching setting in which academic, personal, and linguistic progress of a student is prompted by additional motivation and varied sources of support. The article promotes the idea that techniques and methods described do not require additional classroom time or any radical changes of existing syllabi but rather can help make learning more efficient within the current restrictive educational setting for the second foreign language due to their high flexibility and adaptability. The article contains practical suggestions and hands-on solutions for incorporating them into a present-day higher educational institution curriculum for language students.
Key words: pedagogical universities; students; English language; methods of teaching English; methods of teaching English at university; second foreign language; education process; teaching methods; teaching writing; linguo-methodological support; multilingualism; creative writing; student’s personality

Для цитирования:

Хэкетт-Джонс, А. В. Креативное письмо в обучении языку: необходимость или излишество? / А. В. Хэкетт-Джонс. – Текст : непосредственный // Philological Class. – 2025. – Vol. 30 • No. 3. – С. 185-195. DOI 10.26170/2071-2405-2025-30-3-185-195.

For citation

Hackett-Jones, A. V. (2025). Creative Writing in Language Teaching: Necessity or Accessory? . In Philological Class. 2025. Vol. 30 • No. 3. P. 185-195. DOI 10.26170/2071-2405-2025-30-3-185-195.

About the author(s) :

Aleksandra V. Hackett-Jones

Herzen University (Saint Petersburg, Russia)

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1880-4782

Publication Timeline:

Date of receipt: 29.01.2025; date of publication: 31.10.2025

References:

Azeez, R. A., Sharif, S. I., Abdulla, S. A. (2023). Applying Techniques in Creative Writing by EFL Students. Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 27(4), 347–354.

Barratt, L. (2021). Translanguaging in Teaching / Learning Languages. Research Questions in Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 171–175. Springer, Cham: Springer Texts in Education.

Benson, Ph., Barkhuizen, G., Bodycott, P., Brown, J. (2013). Second language identity. Second language identity in narratives of study abroad, 17–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bruner, J. (1983). Child’s Talk: Learning to Use Language. New York: Norton, 144 p.

Cenoz, J., Hufelsen, B., Jessner, U. (2001). Towards trilingual education. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 4(1), 1–10.

Colton, Ch. C. (1824). Lacon: or Many Things in Few Words; addressed to those who think (vol. 1). New York, 272 p.

Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., Short, D. J. (2010). Making content comprehensible for English learners: The SIOP Model. 2nd edition. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc., 292 p.

Eggers, D. (2005). How We Are Hungry. Vintage, 224 p.

Hackett-Jones, A. V. (2025). Tvorchestvo kak diskursivnaya deyatel′nost′: k voprosu o roli tvorcheskogo myshleniya v formirovanii yazykovoy lichnosti = Creative as a discoursive activity: On the issue of creative thinking’s impact on language identity formation. Cognitive Studies of Language, 1-1(62), 849–853. EDN XTKJWN.

Inozemtseva, K. M. (2015). Tekhnologiya lingvo-metodicheskoy obuchayushchey podderzhki v mezhdistsiplinarnoy inoyazychnoy podgotovke tekhnicheskogo vuza = Scaffolded instruction in interdisciplinary foreign language teaching of technical universities. Modern additional professional pedagogical education, 1, 3(3), 92–102. EDN UKIYNT.

Kaur, R. (2018). Milk and Honey. Andrews McMeel Publishing, 208 p.

Kizrina, N. G., Eliseeva, O. R. (2022). Ispol′zovanie kreativnykh tekhnologiy pri obuchenii inostrannomu yazyku studentov pedagogicheskikh vuzov = The use of creative technologies in foreign language teaching of students at pedagogical institutions of higher education. Samara Journal of Science, 11(3), 271–277. DOI: 10.55355/snv2022113308. EDN AVDGHI.

Kolb, A. Y., Kolb, D. A. (2012). Learning Identity. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 1889–1890. Springer.

LaScotte, K. D. (2018). Using Writing as a Scaffold to Academic Discussions in the Foreign Language Classroom. English Teaching Forum, 24–31. Available at October 2, 2025 from americanenglish.state.gov/english-teaching-forum.

Lucas, B., Spencer, E. (2022). Teaching Creative Thinking. Crown House Publishing Limited, 204 p.

Mahroof, S. R. (2017). Scaffolding interaction in English as a second language classroom: a socio-cultural analysis. 7th International Symposium 2017 on “Multidisciplinary Research for Sustainable Development”, 294–333. South Eastern University of Sri Lanka. Available at October 2, 2025 from http://ir.lib.seu.ac.lk/handle/123456789/3014.

Maley, A. (2012). Creative Writing for Students and Teachers. Humanising Language Teaching, 14(3). Available at October 2, 2025 from http://old.hltmag.co.uk/jun12/index.htm.

Mardiningrum, A., Sistyawan, Y. N. I., Wirantaka, A. (2024). Creative Writing for EFL Classroom: Students’ Perception on Its Benefits. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(1), 546–555.

Niloy, A. C., Akter, S., Sultana, N. et al. (2024). Is Chatgpt a menace for creative writing ability? An experiment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 919–930.

Pitina, S. A., Shcherbov, A. D. (2021). Kreativnoe pis′mo v prepodavanii inostrannogo yazyka = Creative writing in foreign language teaching. Contemporary higher education: innovative aspects, 13, 2(52), 85–93. DOI: 10.7442/2071-9620-2021-13-2-85-93. EDN PWCVEW.

Sidky, G. (2019). Developing Students’ Writing through Scaffolding Techniques in a Workshop Forum. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(5), 963–971.

Traina, E. (2021). Challenging Conventional Approaches to Teaching Creative Writing in Italy. Journal of Creative Writing Studies, 7, 1(10), 1–23.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge; London: Harvard university press, 159 p.

Walqui, A. (2006). Scaffolding instruction for English Language Learners: A conceptual framework. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(2), 159–180. Available at October 2, 2025 from https://pdfs.
semanticscholar.org/eeaf/a59d9a254ac843f9d8fb94aebd017dae6b76.pdf.

Wu, M. M. (2024). Globalisation and Second Language Identity: Opportunities, Challenges, and the Importance of Morality. Palgrave Macmillan, 163 p.

Zabolotneva, O. L., Kozhukhova, I. V. (2023). Priemy razvitiya navykov kreativnogo pis′ma obuchayushchikhsya yazykovykh spetsial′nostey = Some techniques for developing the skills of creative writing in Linguistics majors. Scientific and methodological electronic journal “Concept”, 5, 108–125. DOI: 10.24412/2304-120X-2023-11037. EDN MANZSU.