Рубрика: REREADING RUSSIAN CLASSICS
Article: PDF
DOI: 10.26170/2071-2405-2026-31-2-31-40
Abstract: The study analyzes of one of the most famous short stories by A. P. Chekhov. The key problem of the work – the problem of the ideal – did not pop up spontaneously in his mind. It was brought about by a number of factors, both biographical and literary in nature. The year the story was written, the writer’s elder brother, the artist Nikolai Chekhov, died of tuberculosis. By that time, the writer himself had already been suffering from the same disease for several years, which in many ways forced him to turn to the existential problems of life and death. Around the same time, a discussion arose in journalism about the content and forms of manifestation of the ideal of human life. One of the stimuli for it was the book by K. D. Kavelin, “The Tasks of Ethics”. As a working hypothesis, the article puts forward the idea that Chekhov was familiar with this book through a long review article published in the journal Severny Vestnik, with which the writer actively collaborated at the time. Therefore, the name of one of the “friends” of Nikolai Stepanovich, the main character of the story, appears not by chance, but quite naturally. Direct parallels are found between Kavelin’s philosophical work and the “notes of an old man”. With his story, Chekhov enters into a large literary and journalistic dialogue that was conducted by the leading Russian critics of the time. The name of N. I. Pirogov is associated with another side of the life of the main character and, indirectly, of the biographical author. Chekhov was undoubtedly familiar with the memoirs of the Russian surgeon and included an almost direct quote from them in his short story. In his notes, Pirogov writes about various aspects of his life, but ends them with the same appeal to the problem of the ideal and the meaning of human existence. N. A. Nekrasov, the third “friend” of the main character of “A Boring Story”, turns out to be related to him on the basis of creativity. Chekhov’s story is written in the first person, thereby revealing Nikolai Stepanovich, a professor and doctor, as a creatively active personality capable of producing highly artistic texts. The article concludes by providing an analysis of the intertextual ties of the story with Pushkin’s poem, as well as the definition of the genre specificity of the “life of a saint”.
Key words: Russian literature; Russian writers; literary genres; literary creativity; literary images; literary characters; short stories; axiology; ideal; intertext; genre of the “life of a saint”; genre stylization; memoirs; biographical nature of prose; A. P. Chekhov

Для цитирования:

Кубасов, А. В. Проблема идеала в рассказе А. П. Чехова «Скучная история» / А. В. Кубасов // Philological Class. – 2026. – Vol. 31 • No. 2. – С. 31-40. DOI 10.26170/2071-2405-2026-31-2-31-40.

For citation

Kubasov, A. V. (2026). The Problem of the Ideal in A. P. Chekhov’s Short Story “A Boring Story”. In Philological Class. 2026. Vol. 31 • No. 2. P. 31-40. DOI 10.26170/2071-2405-2026-31-2-31-40.

About the author(s) :

Alexander V. Kubasov

Ural State Pedagogical University (Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation)

ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9074-1133

Publication Timeline:

Date of receipt: 09.04.2026; date of publication: 30.06.2026

References:

Chekhov, A. P. (1974–1983). Polnoe sobranie sochineniy i pisem: v 30 t. Sochineniya: v 18 t. Pis′ma: v 12 t. = Complete works and letters, in 30 vols. Works, in 18 vols. Letters, in 12 vols. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House.

Chudakov, A. P. (2022). A. P. Chekhov v prizhiznennoy kritike. 1882–1904. Bibliograficheskaya monografiya-ukazatel′. T. 1 = A. P. Chekhov in lifetime criticism. 1882–1904. Bibliographic monograph-index. Vol. 1. Moscow: A. A. Bakhrushin Theatre Museum Publishing House, 520 p.

Chudakov, A. P. (2023). A. P. Chekhov v prizhiznennoy kritike. 1882–1904. Bibliograficheskaya monografiya-ukazatel′. T. 2 = A. P. Chekhov in lifetime criticism. 1882–1904. Bibliographic monograph-index. Vol. 2. Moscow: A. A. Bakhrushin Theatre Museum Publishing House, 500 p.

Goltsev, V. A. (1885). Pamyati Konstantina Dmitrievicha Kavelina (Protokol chrezvychaynogo zasedaniya Moskovskogo yuridicheskogo obshchestva 7 maya 1885 g.) = In memory of Konstantin Dmitrievich Kavelin (Minutes of the extraordinary meeting of the Moscow Law Society, May 7, 1885). Legal Bulletin, 19, 6/7(2/3), 205–219.

Goltsev, V. A. (1892). Nravstvennye idei K. D. Kavelina = Moral ideas of K. D. Kavelin. Russian Idea, 6, 123–137.

Kavelin, K. D. (1886). Zadachi etiki: Uchenie o nravstvennosti pri sovremennykh usloviyakh znaniya = The tasks of ethics: The doctrine of morality under modern conditions of knowledge. Saint Petersburg: Printing House of M. M. Stasyulevich, 148 p.

Koni, A. F. (1885). Pamyati Konstantina Dmitrievicha Kavelina = In memory of Konstantin Dmitrievich Kavelin. Russian Antiquity, XLVI, 649–660.

Mikhailovsky, N. K. (1897). Sochineniya: v 6 t. T. 6 = Works, in 6 vols. Vol. 6. Saint Petersburg: B. M. Wolf Printing House, 1046 c.

Nekrasov, N. A. (1982). Polnoe sobranie sochineniy i pisem: v 15 t. T. 4 = Complete works and letters, in 15 vols. Vol. 4. Leningrad: Nauka Publishing House, 658 p.

Odesskaya, M. M. (2008). Byli li idealy u gospodina Chekhova? = Did Mr. Chekhov have ideals? Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Literary Studies. Linguistics. Cultural Studies. Oriental Studies, 11, 219–227. EDN MPWJQZ.

Ovsyaniko-Kulikovsky, D. N. (1911). Istoriya russkoy intelligentsii. Chast′ tret′ya. 80-e gody i nachalo 90-kh = History of the Russian intelligentsia. Part three. The 1980s and early 1990s. Saint Peterburg: Public Benefit and Book Publishing House “Prometheus”, 224 p.

Pertsov, P. P. (1893). Iz′′yany tvorchestva = The Flaws of creativity. Russian Wealth, 1, 41–71.

Posmertnye zapiski Nikolaya Ivanovicha Pirogova = Posthumous notes of Nikolai Ivanovich Pirogov. (1884). Russian Antiquity, XLIII, 455–502; XLIV, 1–52, 223–274, 445–496; (1885), XLV, 1–54, 257–310, 481–526; XLVI, 1–52, 229–264, 455–480.

Protopopov, M. A. (1892). Zhertva bezvremen′ya = A victim of timelessness. Russian Idea, 6, 95–122.

Razumova, N. E. (2001). Tvorchestvo A. P. Chekhova v aspekte prostranstva = The works of A. P. Chekhov in terms of space. Tomsk: Tomsk State University Publishing House, 522 p. EDN YONMFC.

Skabichesky, A. M. (2002). Yest′ li u g-na Chekhova idealy? = Does Mr. Chekhov have ideals? A. P. Chekhov: Pro et contra, anthology (vol. 1), 144–179. Saint Petersburg: RKhGA Publishing House.

Sukhikh, I. N. (2023). «Skuchnaya istoriya»: neprochitannaya povest′ Chekhova = An unread story by A. P. Chekhov. New World, 10(1182), 196–209. EDN NBBBWX.

Tynyanov, Yu. N. (1977). Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino = Poetics. History of literature. Cinema. Moscow: Nauka Publishing House, 575 p.

Vorontsov, V. P. (1886). Uchenie o nravstvennosti Kavelina: zadachi etiki = Kavelin’s doctrine of morality: The tasks of ethics. Northern Herald, 5, 1–26.